- #Zoommath 500 registration key software
- #Zoommath 500 registration key code
- #Zoommath 500 registration key professional
- #Zoommath 500 registration key windows
#Zoommath 500 registration key software
We have written 6800 BASIC, and are writing 8080 APL and 6800 APL, but there is very little incentive to make this software available to hobbyists.
#Zoommath 500 registration key professional
Who can afford to do professional work for nothing? What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free? The fact is, no one besides us has invested a lot of money in hobby software. One thing you do do is prevent good software from being written. The royalty paid to us, the manual, the tape and the overhead make it a break-even operation. MITS doesn't make money selling software. Is this fair? One thing you don't do by stealing software is get back at MITS for some problem you may have had. Who cares if the people who worked on it get paid? Hardware must be paid for, but software is something to share. Why is this? As the majority of hobbyists must be aware, most of you steal your software. Two surprising things are apparent, however, 1) Most of these "users" never bought BASIC (less than 10% of all Altair owners have bought BASIC), and 2) The amount of royalties we have received from sales to hobbyists makes the time spent on Altair BASIC worth less than $2 an hour. The feedback we have gotten from the hundreds of people who say they are using BASIC has all been positive. The value of the computer time we have used exceeds $40,000. Now we have 4K, 8K, EXTENDED, ROM and DISK BASIC.
Though the initial work took only two months, the three of us have spent most of the last year documenting, improving and adding features to BASIC. Witness Bill Gates' Open Letter To Hobbyists, written in 1976.Īlmost a year ago, Paul Allen and myself, expecting the hobby market to expand, hired Monte Davidoff and developed Altair BASIC.
Microsoft's history with piracy goes way, way back- all the way back to the original microcomputers. Unless you provide some disincentives, that's exactly what people will do- they'll pay nothing for your software. The digital nature of software makes it both easy and impersonal for people to avoid paying (note that I did not say "steal"), which is an irresistible combination for many. Unless you oppose the very concept of commercial software, there has to be some kind of enforcement in place.
#Zoommath 500 registration key windows
Microsoft recently stated that the piracy rate of Vista is half that of XP, largely due to improvements in their Windows Genuine Advantage program- Microsoft's global registration key validation service.Īs a software developer, I can empathize with Microsoft to a degree. You could, in fact, argue that registration key validation actually works. I don't have a problem with registration keys. I'll choose biased data over no data whatsoever, every time. The BSA estimated 35% of all software was pirated in 2006, but it is just that- an estimate. But it is data, and without the registration key concept (and pervasive internet connectivity), we'd have no data whatsoever to quantify how much piracy actually exists. The vendor is never named, and given that the title of the URL is /software-piracy.htm, I'd expect it to be biased. I have no idea how reliable this data is. Occasional internet connection necessary 60 : 1
#Zoommath 500 registration key code
How effective is it? One vendor implemented code to detect false registration keys and phone home with some basic information such as the IP address when these false keys are entered.
Like all piracy solutions- short of completely server hosted applications and games, where piracy means you'd have to host your own rogue server- it's an incomplete client-side solution. Unique registration keys exist only to prevent piracy. Software is digital through and through, and yet there's one unavoidable aspect of software installation that remains thoroughly analog: entering the registration key.
0 kommentar(er)
